<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged umberto eco</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>Two clichés make us laugh. A hundred clichés move us.</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/two_cliches_make_us_laugh._a_hundred_cliches_move_us" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1849</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?I love that in French, a cliché is also a photo negative—that is to say, the cliché is the original.?</em><br />
		
		<p>Thus <i>Casablanca</i> is not just one film. It is many films, an anthology. Made haphazardly, it probably made itself, if not actually against the will of its authors and actors, then at least beyond their control. And this is the reason it works, in spite of aesthetic theories and theories of film making. For in it there unfolds with almost telluric force the power of Narrative in its natural state, without Art intervening to discipline it. And so we can accept it when characters change mood, morality, and psychology from one moment to the next, when conspirators cough to interrupt the conversation if a spy is approaching, when whores weep at the sound of &#8220;La Marseillaise.&#8221; When all the archetypes burst in shamelessly, we reach Homeric depths. Two clichés make us laugh. A hundred clichés move us. For we sense dimly that the clichés are talking <i>among themselves</i>, and celebrating a reunion. Just as the height of pain may encounter sensual pleasure, and the height of perversion border on mystical energy, so too the height of banality allows us to catch a glimpse of the sublime. Something has spoken in place of the director. If nothing else, it is a phenomenon worthy of awe.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_casablanca.html">Casablanca, or, The Clichés are Having a Ball</a>," by Umberto Eco, from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Signs-Life-USA-Readings-Popular/dp/0312478127/cmcom-20"><i>Signs of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers</i></a>, 1994 :: via <a href="http://colinmeloy.tumblr.com/post/425264166/two-cliches-make-us-laugh-but-a-hundred-cliches">Colin Meloy</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Written as they should be</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/written_as_they_should_be" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1643</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?Here's the best thing about this excerpt: when you click through to the Eco's original article, right now you get this message: "This article has been removed due to web rights expiry." Frail letters indeed! But let's return to penmanship: I'm reminded of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/09/04/opinion/20090908_opart.html">this recent New York Times Op-Art piece</a>, a spirited call to supplant the old-style loopiness of the Palmer method of handwriting instruction with a more-legible italic script. Sounds tempting ...?</em><br />
		
		<p>My parents&#8217; handwriting was slightly slanted because they held the sheet at an angle, and their letters were, at least by today&#8217;s standards, minor works of art. At the time, some – probably those with poor hand- writing – said that fine writing was the art of fools. It&#8217;s obvious that fine handwriting does not necessarily mean fine intelligence. But it was pleasing to read notes or documents written as they should be. My generation was schooled in good handwriting, and we spent the first months of elementary school learning to make the strokes of letters. The exercise was later held to be obtuse and repressive but it taught us to keep our wrists steady as we used our pens to form letters rounded and plump on one side and finely drawn on the other. Well, not always – because the inkwells, with which we soiled our desks, notebooks, fingers and clothing, would often produce a foul sludge that stuck to the pen and took 10 minutes of mucky contortions to clean.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/09/umberto-eco-the-lost-art-of-handwriting.html">The lost art of handwriting</a>," by Umberto Eco, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/sep/21/umberto-eco-handwriting">The Guardian</a>, 21 September 2009 :: via <a href="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2009/09/umberto-eco-the-lost-art-of-handwriting.html">3quarksdaily</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>